ERCOT·WATCH Search ercot.com  ⌕
RMGRR #181 · Revision Request

RMGRR181  Alignment of Defined Term Usage and Resolution of Inconsistencies

Approved sponsor ERCOT posted 2024-04-30 ercot.com
ReasonGeneral system and/or process improvements
Created2024-06-04
Approved2024-11-21
Sections Affected
2.15.37.37.3.2.1.27.3.2.27.3.2.47.3.2.57.3.2.5.17.3.2.67.3.2.77.3.2.87.3.2.97.3.37.3.4.27.3.4.47.3.57.3.5.17.10.47.11.17.11.1.4.1.27.11.1.4.2.27.11.1.4.2.37.11.27.11.2.47.11.2.4.27.11.57.11.67.16.4.3.17.16.4.3.27.16.4.3.37.17.3.3.17.17.3.3.27.17.3.3.3
Summary
This Retail Market Guide Revision Request (RMGRR) aligns defined term usage in the Retail Market Guide with Protocol Section 2.1, Definitions, relocates four definitions from Retail Market Guide Section 2.1 (‘Decision’, Effective Date’, ‘Gaining Competitive Retailer’, and ‘Losing Competitive Retailer’) to Protocol Section 2.1 since these definitions are used in both the Retail Market Guide and the Nodal Protocols, and removes the no-longer-needed defined term ‘Target Effective Date.’ This RMGRR also aligns greybox language in paragraph (4) of Section 7.3.2.5 with RMGRR170, Inadvertent Gain Process Updates, removes paragraph (1) from Sections 7.11.1 and 7.11.2 due to redundancy, and makes non-substantive clarifying changes to resolve inconsistencies in Sections 7.16.4.3.2, 7.16.4.3.3, 7.17.3.3.2, and 7.17.3.3.3.
Timeline