PGRR #26 · Revision Request
PGRR026 Addition of Year 6 to the SSWG Base Cases
ReasonThe present bases cases (Data Set B) cover a planning period of five years. This timeframe is not sufficient to address large regional projects with scopes requiring long-lead time consideration (i.e., 345-kV and certification). In many cases, the entire project spectrum including initial assessments, identification of alternatives, project selection, certification, and implementation takes longer than five years. Additionally, near-term economic projects potentially having reliability drivers beyond the five-year planning horizon can be supported with this additional base case. Similarly, this additional Year 6 base case can help provide direction to the selection of a longer term solution potentially resulting in a more cost-effective near-term plan development. Lastly, proposed North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Reliability Standard TPL-001-2, Transmission System Planning Performance Requirements, requires assessment for one of the years in the "Long-Term Transmission Planning Horizon (years 6-10)".
Created2012-12-04
Approved2013-03-19
Sections Affected
3.1.13.1.1.13.1.1.23.1.2.13.1.2.23.1.43.1.4.13.1.4.26.16.4.16.4.26.4.36.4.46.7
Summary
This Planning Guide Revision Request (PGRR) adds a sixth year (Year 6) to the Steady State Working Group (SSWG) Data Set B base cases. Revisions to the Transmission Project and Information Tracking (TPIT) and Annual Load Data Request (ALDR) procedures will be required as result of this PGRR.
Timeline
- Nov 19 '12
-
Dec 4 '12
PLWG Planning Working Group (PLWG) MeetingPLWGRecommended for Approval Recommended for approval Amended by the Dec 3 '12 Luminant comments Amended by the PLWG comments“To recommend approval of PGRR026 as amended by the 12/3/12 Luminant comments and as revised by PLWG”→ PLWG Language Consideration
-
Jan 3 '13
PLWG Planning Working Group (PLWG) Meeting by WebEx onlyPLWGRecommended for Approval Recommended for approval Amended by the Dec 4 '12 PLWG comments Forwarded → ROS“To endorse and forward the 12/4/12 PLWG as revised by PLWG and the Impact Analysis to ROS”→ ROS Consideration
-
Jan 9 '13
Listed without action at 1 meeting
-
Jan 10 '13
ROS Reliability and Operations Subcommittee (ROS) MeetingROSRecommended for Approval Recommended for approval“To recommend approval of the revised Impact Analysis for PGRR026” — Passed→ TAC Consideration
-
Feb 7 '13
TAC Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) MeetingTACRecommended for Approval Recommended for approval Amended by the Jan 29 '13 ERCOT comments“To recommend approval of PGRR026 as revised by the 1/29/13 ERCOT comments” — Passed→ ERCOT Board Consideration
-
Mar 19 '13
BOARD Board of Directors MeetingBOARDApproved Recommended for approval“To approve PGRR026 as recommended by TAC in the 2/7/13 TAC Report” — Passed
- Mar 27 '13