PGRR #4 · Revision Request
PGRR004 Synchronization with NPRR291, Reduce the Comment Period for NPRRs and SCRs
ReasonAs a result of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) structural and process review, TAC requested ERCOT staff to draft an NPRR to reduce the comment period for NPRRs to 14 days. Since PGRRs have a similar initial comment period, proposed revisions to Planning Guide revision process are included in this PGRR to align with the Nodal Protocol revision process.
Created2011-01-21
Approved2011-05-17
Sections Affected
2.4.3
Summary
This Planning Guide Revision Request (PGRR) reduces the comment period for PGRRs from 21 days to 14 days and removes the requirement for the comment period to end at least three Business Days prior to the next regularly scheduled Planning Working Group (PLWG) meeting.
Timeline
- Dec 27 '10
-
Jan 21 '11
PLWG Planning Working Group MeetingPLWGRecommended for Approval Recommended for approval“Consensus to recommend approval of PGRR004 as submitted”→ PLWG IA Review
-
Feb 25 '11
PLWG Planning Working Group MeetingPLWGRecommended for Approval Recommended for approval Forwarded → ROS“Consensus to endorse and forward the 1/21/11 PLWG Report and Impact Analysis for PGRR004 to ROS”→ ROS Consideration
-
Mar 10 '11
ROS ROS MeetingROSRecommended for Approval Recommended for approval“To recommend approval of PGRR004 as recommended by the PLWG in the 2/25/11 PLWG Report” — Passed→ TAC Consideration
-
Apr 7 '11
TAC TAC MeetingTACRecommended for Approval Recommended for approval“To recommend approval of PGRR004 as recommended by ROS in the 3/10/11 ROS Report.” — Passed→ ERCOT Board Consideration
-
May 17 '11
BOARDEmail Vote / Unlisted MeetingBOARDApproved Approved“To approve PGRR004 as recommended by TAC in the 4/7/11 TAC Report.” — Passed
-
—
Posted since the last meeting