NPRR #487 · Revision Request
NPRR487 QSGR Dispatch Adjustment
ReasonThe amount of time that QSGRs are being called upon to resolve congestion has highlighted a localized Locational Marginal Price (LMP) formation problem that this NPRR seeks to resolve. When a transmission constraint becomes active in SCED that requires a Base Point to a QSGR that is less than its physical Low Sustained Limit (LSL) (e.g., Base Point to 5 MW when its physical LSL is 45 MW), the QSGR is brought On-Line to its physical LSL within ten minutes to comply with the Base Point. The LMP at the QSGR bus when the initial positive Base Point is issued corresponds to the Mitigated Offer Cap of the QSGR (assuming the constraint is non-competitive); however, after the QSGR reaches its physical LSL, SCED will often no longer bind for long periods of time on the transmission constraint (i.e. the constraint becomes "inactive") because the amount of generation needed at the QSGR site to resolve the constraint was less than the physical LSL of the QSGR (e.g., 40 MW less using the 5 MW Base Point and 45 MW LSL described above). While this situation is occurring, LMPs at the QSGR site are clearing below the Mitigated Offer Cap of the QSGR, which means the QSGR is likely operating at a short-run marginal cost loss to allow SCED to manage congestion. With the 9/12/12 WMS vote to revise the Verifiable Cost Manual formula that establishes the Mitigated Offer Cap for QSGRs to amortize a QSGR’s start cost across all hours of historic run time during a defined period, including those at which it was being called upon to operate at a short-run marginal cost loss for the reasons outlined above, it is important to correct this localized pricing problem as quickly as possible.
Created2012-10-18
Approved2013-03-19
Sections Affected
3.8.36.6.5.38.1.1.4.1
Summary
This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) modifies the emergency energy Settlement treatment of a Quick Start Generation Resource (QSGR) that is brought On-Line with a Base Point less than or equal to its Resource registration applicable Seasonal net minimum sustainable rating. The changes remove the limitation for compensation using an Energy Offer Curve price that is capped by the Mitigated Offer Cap (adjusted to include variable Operations and Maintenance (O&M)). Currently the limitation is two "q" Settlement Intervals. The NPRR would allow this compensation until Security-Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED) no longer needs the QSGR to generate, subject to performance of the QSGR Decommitment Decision Process. The NPRR also details the QSGR Decommitment Decision Process.
Timeline
- Oct 3 '12
-
Oct 8 '12
Listed without action at 2 meetings (Oct 8 '12 – Oct 10 '12)
-
Oct 18 '12
PRS Protocol Revision Subcommittee (PRS) MeetingPRSRecommended for Approval Recommended for approval Forwarded → PRS“To recommend approval of NPRR487 as submitted and that NPRR487 return to the November 15, 2012 PRS meeting with an Impact Analysis.” — Passed→ PRS for Impact Analysis review.
-
Nov 15 '12
PRS Protocol Revision Subcommittee (PRS) MeetingPRSDeferred/Tabled Tabled“To table NPRR487 for one month.” — Passed→ PRS for consideration.
-
Dec 13 '12
PRS Protocol Revision Subcommittee (PRS) MeetingPRSDeferred/Tabled Tabled“To table NPRR487 for one month.” — Passed→ PRS for consideration.
-
Jan 17 '13
PRS Protocol Revision Subcommittee (PRS) MeetingPRSRecommended for Approval Recommended for approval Forwarded → TAC Amended by the Jan 17 '13 Luminant Energy Company LLC comments“To endorse and forward the 12/13/12 PRS Report as amended by the 1/17/13 Luminant Energy Company LLC comments to TAC” — Passed→ TAC Consideration
-
Feb 7 '13
TAC Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) MeetingTACRecommended for Approval Recommended for approval Amended by the Feb 6 '13 Luminant Energy Company LLC comments Forwarded → TAC“To recommend approval of NPRR487 as recommended by PRS in the 1/17/13 PRS Report, as amended by the 2/6/13 Luminant Energy Company LLC comments and as revised by TAC; and to request that a revised Impact Analysis be brought back to TAC for consideration.” — Passed→ TAC for review of the Impact Analysis.
-
Mar 7 '13
TAC Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) MeetingTACRecommended for Approval Recommended for approval priority 2014 · rank 960“To to recommend approval of NPRR487 as recommended by TAC in the 2/7/13 TAC Report with a recommended priority of 2014 and rank of 960.” — Passed→ ERCOT Board for consideration.
-
Mar 19 '13
BOARD Board of Directors MeetingBOARDApproved Recommended for approval“To approve NPRR487 as recommended by TAC in the 3/7/13 TAC Report.” — Passed
-
—
Posted since the last meeting