NPRR #264 · Revision Request
NPRR264 Clarification of Nodal Protocol Requirements for Generators With Multiple Points of Interconnection
ReasonSome Nodal Protocol requirements applicable to Generation Resources are based upon the date of execution of the SGIA between the Resource owner and the Transmission Service Provider (TSP). For Resources with more than one POI, the question arises which SGIA date should be used to determine applicability of such requirements to the Resource. The Multiple Interconnections for Generators Task Force (MIGTF) recommended that the date of the original SGIA be binding for this purpose. The MIGTF recommendation was endorsed by the Reliability and Operations Subcommittee (ROS), Wholesale Market Subcommittee (WMS), and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). This NPRR clarifies which Nodal Protocol and OBD requirements are applicable to an existing Generation Resource’s new or multiple POIs.
Created2010-08-19
Approved2011-06-21
Sections Affected
1.6.52.1
Summary
This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) adds language to specify that for a new Point of Interconnection (POI), Generation Resources must comply with provisions of Other Binding Documents (OBDs), Section 3.15, Voltage Support, and Nodal Operating Guide Section 2.9, Voltage Ride-Through Requirements for Generation Resources, based upon the execution date of the most recent Standard Generation Interconnection Agreement (SGIA). For existing Generation Resources with more than one POI, compliance with these requirements is based on the execution of the SGIA relative to the POI where the Generation Resource is electrically connected. This NPRR also revises the definition of POI to clarify that the POI is determined by the voltage level and substation, rather than the location, of the relevant interconnection.
Timeline
- Aug 12 '10
-
Aug 19 '10
PRS PRS MeetingPRSDeferred/Tabled Tabled“To table NPRR264 for one month.” — Passed→ PRS language consideration
-
Sep 23 '10
PRS PRS MeetingPRSDeferred/Tabled Tabled Action“To table NPRR264 and to request that the ERCOT CEO reevaluate whether NPRR264 is needed prior to the Texas Nodal Market Implementation Date.” — Passed→ PRS language consideration
- Oct 4 '10
-
Oct 4 '10
Listed without action at 1 meeting
-
Oct 21 '10
PRS PRS MeetingPRSDeferred/Tabled Tabled“To table NPRR264 for one month.” — Passed→ PRS language consideration
-
Nov 18 '10
PRS PRS MeetingPRSDeferred/Tabled Tabled“To table NPRR264 for one month.” — Passed→ PRS language consideration
- Dec 15 '10
-
Dec 16 '10
PRS PRS MeetingPRSDeferred/Tabled Tabled“To table NPRR264 for one month.” — Passed→ PRS language consideration
- Jan 12 '11
-
Jan 20 '11
PRS PRS MeetingPRSDeferred/Tabled Tabled“To table NPRR264 for one month.” — Passed→ PRS langauge consideration
- Feb 8 '11
-
Feb 17 '11
PRS PRS MeetingPRSDeferred/Tabled Tabled“To table NPRR264 for one month.” — Passed→ PRS language consideration
- Mar 9 '11
-
Mar 24 '11
PRS PRS MeetingPRSRecommended for Approval Recommended for approval Amended by the Jan 11 '11 ERCOT comments“To recommend approval of NPRR264 as amended by the 1/11/11 ERCOT comments and as revised by PRS.” — Passed→ PRS Impact Analysis review
-
Apr 21 '11
PRS PRS MeetingPRSRecommended for Approval Recommended for approval Forwarded → TAC“To endorse and forward the 3/24/11 PRS Report and Impact Analysis for NPRR264 to TAC.” — Passed→ TAC consideration of NPRR264
-
May 5 '11
TAC TAC MeetingTACRecommended for Approval Recommended for approval“To recommend approval of NPRR264 as recommended by PRS in the 4/21/11 PRS Report.” — Passed→ ERCOT Board consideration of NPRR264
-
Jun 21 '11
BOARD Board of Directors MeetingBOARDApproved Recommended for approval“To approve NPRR264 as recommended by TAC in the 5/5/11 TAC Report.” — Passed
-
—
Posted since the last meeting